Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWFX
GTDCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWFX
GTDCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GTDCX (1.33B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: GTDCX (2.16) vs RNWFX (1.19). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). GTDCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). GTDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWFX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). GTDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.05 vs. RNWFX (19.68). GTDCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.08 vs. RNWFX (14.77).
| GTDCX | RNWFX | GTDCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.62 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.62 | 347% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.539 | 12.700 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.19 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.05 | 19.68 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.66 | 44.28 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.08 | 14.77 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.30 | 110.07 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement