Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWHX
GTDCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWHX
GTDCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. GTDCX (1.44B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDCX (2.20) vs RNWHX (1.15). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). GTDCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GTDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). GTDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.38 vs. RNWHX (29.50). GTDCX (19.28) and RNWHX (19.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GTDCX | RNWHX | GTDCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.72 | 299% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.72 | 299% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 47.272 | 16.719 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 85.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 1.15 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.38 | 29.50 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.53 | 56.33 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.28 | 19.26 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.50 | 121.12 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers