Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWHX
GTDCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWHX
GTDCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GTDCX (1.33B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDCX (2.16) vs RNWHX (1.14). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). GTDCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GTDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). GTDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.05 vs. RNWHX (19.47). GTDCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.08 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| GTDCX | RNWHX | GTDCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.72 | 299% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.72 | 299% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.539 | 12.651 | 313% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.14 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.05 | 19.47 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.66 | 43.67 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.08 | 14.04 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.30 | 107.31 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement