Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWBX
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$36.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.39
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. GTDFX (1.23B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDFX (1.41) vs RNWBX (0.13). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDFX (1.01). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDFX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX (11.11) and RNWBX (10.83) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.82 vs. GTDFX (-0.49).
| GTDFX | RNWBX | GTDFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.819 | 17.458 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 71.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.13 | 1,095% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 10.83 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.34 | 34.80 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.49 | 17.82 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.33 | 79.12 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement