Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWBX
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$39.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. GTDFX (1.11B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDFX (1.25) vs RNWBX (0.12). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDFX (1.01). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDFX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.02 vs. RNWBX (17.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.89 vs. GTDFX (0.41).
| GTDFX | RNWBX | GTDFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.441 | 22.896 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.12 | 1,066% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.02 | 17.87 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.48 | 43.03 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.41 | 15.89 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.52 | 82.21 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement