Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWFX
GTDFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWFX
GTDFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. GTDFX (1.44B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: GTDFX (3.00) vs RNWFX (1.20). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GTDFX (14 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). GTDFX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). GTDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWFX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.17 vs. RNWFX (31.39). GTDFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.62 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| GTDFX | RNWFX | GTDFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 49.841 | 18.794 | 265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 90.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 1.20 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.17 | 31.39 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.66 | 58.06 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.62 | 20.98 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.50 | 135.60 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement