Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWHX
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWHX
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Buy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. GTDFX (1.35B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDFX (3.00) vs RNWHX (1.15). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDFX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). GTDFX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GTDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.20 vs. RNWHX (17.19). GTDFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.92 vs. RNWHX (17.68).
| GTDFX | RNWHX | GTDFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.72 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.72 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 44.566 | 16.447 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 90B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 1.15 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.20 | 17.19 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.70 | 53.84 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.92 | 17.68 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.22 | 111.44 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers