Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWHX
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWHX
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GTDFX (1.33B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDFX (2.94) vs RNWHX (1.14). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDFX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). GTDFX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GTDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.85 vs. RNWHX (19.47). GTDFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.19 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| GTDFX | RNWHX | GTDFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.72 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.72 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.386 | 12.651 | 319% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 1.14 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.85 | 19.47 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.97 | 43.67 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.19 | 14.04 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.43 | 107.31 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement