Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDYX vs RNWBX
GTDYX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDYX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China Y
Price$39.98
Change-$0.29 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
GTDYX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDYX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDYX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. GTDYX (1.12B). GTDYX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDYX (1.13) vs RNWBX (0.12). GTDYX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDYX (17 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDYX (1.14). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDYX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDYX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDYX (1000). GTDYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.88 vs. RNWBX (18.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. GTDYX (0.18).
| GTDYX | RNWBX | GTDYX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.300 | 23.046 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 74.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.12 | 967% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.88 | 18.50 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.92 | 43.20 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.18 | 16.42 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.97 | 82.43 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement