Ad is loading...
GTLB
Price
$59.24
Change
-$0.63 (-1.05%)
Updated
Nov 18, 03:24 PM (EDT)
17 days until earnings call
ONVVF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

GTLB vs ONVVF

Header iconGTLB vs ONVVF Comparison
Open Charts GTLB vs ONVVFBanner chart's image
GitLab
Price$59.24
Change-$0.63 (-1.05%)
Volume$1.65K
CapitalizationN/A
Oneview Healthcare
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.6K
CapitalizationN/A
GTLB vs ONVVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLB vs. ONVVF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a Sell and ONVVF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GTLB: $59.87 vs. ONVVF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: GTLB and ONVVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLB: 108% vs. ONVVF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GTLB: $9.25B vs. ONVVF: $80.17M
GTLB [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.25B. ONVVF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $80.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileONVVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ONVVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the long-term than ONVVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GTLB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GTLB (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while ONVVF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.23% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLB($9.25B) has a higher market cap than ONVVF($80.2M). GTLB YTD gains are higher at: -4.908 vs. ONVVF (-6.667). ONVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.05M vs. GTLB (-180.9M). GTLB has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. ONVVF (15.2M). GTLB has less debt than ONVVF: GTLB (410K) vs ONVVF (1.21M). GTLB has higher revenues than ONVVF: GTLB (580M) vs ONVVF (10.2M).
GTLBONVVFGTLB / ONVVF
Capitalization9.25B80.2M11,534%
EBITDA-180.9M-8.05M2,248%
Gain YTD-4.908-6.66774%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue580M10.2M5,686%
Total Cash1.04B15.2M6,816%
Total Debt410K1.21M34%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
III3.350.01
+0.30%
Information Services Group
BANF121.78-1.14
-0.93%
BancFirst Corp
HST17.26-0.20
-1.15%
Host Hotels & Resorts
AMAL35.56-0.90
-2.47%
Amalgamated Financial Corp
JAGX0.96-0.08
-7.69%
Jaguar Health Inc.

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
-2.09%
COIN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+9.69%
CLSK - GTLB
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
MDB - GTLB
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
RIOT - GTLB
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
INTU - GTLB
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
More

ONVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONVVF has been loosely correlated with BB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONVVF jumps, then BB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONVVF
1D Price
Change %
ONVVF100%
N/A
BB - ONVVF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
SRAD - ONVVF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
ZDGGF - ONVVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGCB - ONVVF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTLB - ONVVF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
More