GTLB
Price
$49.02
Change
+$1.76 (+3.72%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.1B
6 days until earnings call
XNET
Price
$7.02
Change
+$0.34 (+5.09%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
440.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLB vs XNET

Header iconGTLB vs XNET Comparison
Open Charts GTLB vs XNETBanner chart's image
GitLab
Price$49.02
Change+$1.76 (+3.72%)
Volume$95.8K
Capitalization8.1B
Xunlei
Price$7.02
Change+$0.34 (+5.09%)
Volume$1.66K
Capitalization440.41M
GTLB vs XNET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XNET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLB vs. XNET commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a StrongBuy and XNET is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GTLB: $47.26 vs. XNET: $6.68)
Brand notoriety: GTLB and XNET are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLB: 114% vs. XNET: 84%
Market capitalization -- GTLB: $8.1B vs. XNET: $440.41M
GTLB [@Computer Communications] is valued at $8.1B. XNET’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $440.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXNET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XNET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, XNET is a better buy in the long-term than GTLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLB’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XNET’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • XNET’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than XNET.

Price Growth

GTLB (@Computer Communications) experienced а +8.15% price change this week, while XNET (@Computer Communications) price change was -8.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+3.50% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLB($8.1B) has a higher market cap than XNET($440M). GTLB has higher P/E ratio than XNET: GTLB (544.72) vs XNET (251.58). XNET YTD gains are higher at: 235.678 vs. GTLB (-16.131). XNET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.75M vs. GTLB (-112.15M). GTLB has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. XNET (276M). GTLB has less debt than XNET: GTLB (392K) vs XNET (70.3M). GTLB has higher revenues than XNET: GTLB (805M) vs XNET (332M).
GTLBXNETGTLB / XNET
Capitalization8.1B440M1,841%
EBITDA-112.15M-6.75M1,661%
Gain YTD-16.131235.678-7%
P/E Ratio544.72251.58217%
Revenue805M332M242%
Total Cash1.11B276M400%
Total Debt392K70.3M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XNET: Fundamental Ratings
XNET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLBXNET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XNET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWICX72.190.07
+0.10%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R3
CTHRX107.88N/A
N/A
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst2
RMLPX24.79N/A
N/A
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Class I
ABWCX16.15N/A
N/A
AB All Market Total Return C
WAYFX19.25N/A
N/A
Waycross Focused Core Equity Fund

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
+7.97%
PATH - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
HUBS - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
TEAM - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.65%
COIN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
NTNX - GTLB
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
More

XNET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XNET and TUYA have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XNET and TUYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XNET
1D Price
Change %
XNET100%
-1.04%
TUYA - XNET
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
EVTC - XNET
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
ILLMF - XNET
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
GTLB - XNET
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.97%
FIVN - XNET
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.92%
More