Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLLX vs RGACX
GTLLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GTLLX vs RGACX
Glenmede Disciplined US Growth Eq Ptf
Price$29.83
Change-$0.32 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.59
Change-$0.14 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
GTLLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLLX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLLX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. GTLLX (1.25B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GTLLX: RGACX (0.07) vs GTLLX (0.00). GTLLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GTLLX (22 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than GTLLX (0.86). GTLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GTLLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GTLLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.28 vs. GTLLX (-13.26). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.76 vs. GTLLX (-6.35).
| GTLLX | RGACX | GTLLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.016 | 17.502 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.26 | 17.28 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.23 | 58.54 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.35 | 46.76 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.75 | 98.36 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement