Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLLX vs RGACX
GTLLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GTLLX vs RGACX
Glenmede Disciplined US Growth Eq Ptf
Price$27.87
Change+$0.15 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.84
Change+$0.73 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
GTLLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLLX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLLX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. GTLLX (1.24B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GTLLX: RGACX (0.08) vs GTLLX (0.00). GTLLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GTLLX (21 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than GTLLX (0.86). GTLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GTLLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GTLLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.77 vs. GTLLX (-18.29). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.86 vs. GTLLX (-11.42).
| GTLLX | RGACX | GTLLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.722 | 5.348 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 305B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.29 | 8.77 | -209% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.46 | 36.12 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.42 | 42.86 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.61 | 71.82 | 26% |