Ad is loading...
GTLOX vs RWMFX
GTLOX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GTLOX vs RWMFX
Glenmede Quant US Large Cap Core Eq
Price$21.53
Change+$0.18 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets590.27M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.15
Change+$0.49 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.11B
GTLOX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLOX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLOX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. GTLOX (590M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GTLOX: RWMFX (1.70) vs GTLOX (0.86). GTLOX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GTLOX (21 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GTLOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RWMFX (30.00). GTLOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GTLOX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.96 vs. GTLOX (-3.59). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.43 vs. GTLOX (-15.51).
| GTLOX | RWMFX | GTLOX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.851 | 4.258 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 195B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.70 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.59 | 12.96 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.21 | 14.51 | -160% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.51 | 42.43 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.06 | 69.42 | 14% |