Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLOX vs RWMFX
GTLOX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GTLOX vs RWMFX
GTLOX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLOX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLOX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GTLOX (439M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GTLOX: RWMFX (1.40) vs GTLOX (0.48). GTLOX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GTLOX (22 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GTLOX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GTLOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GTLOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GTLOX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GTLOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.85 vs. RWMFX (7.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. GTLOX (-20.66).
| GTLOX | RWMFX | GTLOX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.983 | 1.322 | 1,587% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.85 | 7.03 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.39 | 30.20 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.66 | 26.38 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.43 | 82.33 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement