GTMLF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
117.71M
SMRVF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTMLF vs SMRVF

Header iconGTMLF vs SMRVF Comparison
Open Charts GTMLF vs SMRVFBanner chart's image
GREEN TECHNOLOGY METALS
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$52.28K
Capitalization117.71M
Smooth Rock Ventures
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$32.5K
Capitalization2.31M
GTMLF vs SMRVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTMLF vs. SMRVF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTMLF is a Hold and SMRVF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GTMLF: $0.01 vs. SMRVF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: GTMLF and SMRVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTMLF: 672% vs. SMRVF: 592%
Market capitalization -- GTMLF: $117.71M vs. SMRVF: $2.31M
GTMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $117.71M. SMRVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMRVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMRVF is a better buy in the long-term than GTMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMRVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SMRVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTMLF is a better buy in the short-term than SMRVF.

Price Growth

GTMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while SMRVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +67.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTMLF($118M) has a higher market cap than SMRVF($2.31M). SMRVF YTD gains are higher at: 44.000 vs. GTMLF (-72.115). SMRVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -220.05K vs. GTMLF (-6.21M).
GTMLFSMRVFGTMLF / SMRVF
Capitalization118M2.31M5,106%
EBITDA-6.21M-220.05K2,822%
Gain YTD-72.11544.000-164%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A721K-
Total DebtN/A237K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMRVF: Fundamental Ratings
SMRVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMLFSMRVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPPL2.710.07
+2.74%
Simpple Ltd
PLCE4.890.06
+1.24%
Children's Place
DRD13.800.15
+1.10%
DRDGOLD Ltd
SKT31.680.31
+0.99%
Tanger
HUBB414.84-0.28
-0.07%
Hubbell

GTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTMLF and SMRVF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTMLF and SMRVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTMLF
1D Price
Change %
GTMLF100%
N/A
SMRVF - GTMLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+13.49%
HRFEF - GTMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSNF - GTMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VCUFF - GTMLF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
MGMNF - GTMLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
More

SMRVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMRVF and GTMLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMRVF and GTMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMRVF
1D Price
Change %
SMRVF100%
+13.49%
GTMLF - SMRVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASMMF - SMRVF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
AAGFF - SMRVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
BSENF - SMRVF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
CPPKF - SMRVF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
More