Ad is loading...
GUNR vs LITP
GUNR vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts GUNR vs LITP
FlexShares Mstar Glbl Upstrm Nat Res ETF
Price$38.75
Change-$0.30 (-0.77%)
Volume$441.06K
Net Assets4.68B
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.91
Change-$0.04 (-0.67%)
Volume$1.16K
Net Assets13.35M
GUNR vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GUNR vs. LITP commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GUNR is a Buy and LITP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GUNR has more net assets: 4.69B vs. LITP (13.3M). GUNR has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: GUNR (7.299) vs LITP (-10.928). GUNR was incepted earlier than LITP: GUNR (14 years) vs LITP (2 years). GUNR (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). LITP has a higher turnover GUNR (21.00) vs GUNR (21.00).
| GUNR | LITP | GUNR / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 7.299 | -10.928 | -67% |
| Net Assets | 4.69B | 13.3M | 35,226% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.65 | 71% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 49.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 3.52 | 7.94 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GUNR | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FCOM | 60.01 | 0.64 | +1.08% |
| Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF | |||
| LQDB | 84.73 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| ZSB | 13.61 | N/A | N/A |
| USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Stgy Fd | |||
| KBWD | 13.92 | -0.08 | -0.57% |
| Invesco KBW High Dividend Yld Fincl ETF | |||
| ECML | 30.73 | -0.45 | -1.44% |
| Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | |||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 66% Closely correlated | -3.49% | ||
More | ||||