GUNR
Price
$55.29
Change
-$1.14 (-2.02%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Net Assets
7.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$108.77
Change
-$0.67 (-0.61%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Net Assets
4.48B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GUNR vs XME

GUNR vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 04, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF (GUNR) vs. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • GUNR provides broad global exposure to upstream natural resources including energy, agriculture, and metals, while XME offers concentrated U.S.-focused exposure to metals and mining companies.
  • GUNR holds approximately 170-180 securities with a market-cap tilted approach, compared to XME’s roughly 39 holdings in an equal-weighted structure that emphasizes smaller and mid-cap names.
  • GUNR carries a net expense ratio of 0.46%, while XME is more cost-efficient at 0.35%.
  • GUNR features diversified sector allocations across energy, materials, and consumer staples with significant international holdings, whereas XME is almost entirely U.S.-based and heavily tilted toward materials sub-industries such as steel, gold, and coal.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and target commodity-linked equities, but GUNR’s broader thematic scope may appeal to investors seeking diversified natural resources exposure, while XME suits those focused on domestic mining cycles.
  • Structural differences in geographic reach, weighting methodology, and holdings concentration drive distinct risk and return profiles over market cycles.

Introduction

Investors comparing natural resources exposure often evaluate GUNR and XME because both provide equity access to commodity-producing companies without direct futures contracts. GUNR and XME do not compete directly; instead, they represent complementary yet differentiated strategies within the broader natural resources and materials theme. GUNR delivers diversified global upstream exposure across energy, agriculture, and metals, while XME concentrates on U.S. metals and mining sub-industries. This comparison helps investors understand how structural features influence positioning amid commodity price fluctuations, sector rotation, and macroeconomic shifts.

Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF (GUNR) Overview

GUNR seeks to track the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index, which measures performance of companies involved in the ownership, management, or production of natural resources in energy, agriculture, precious and industrial metals, timber, and water sectors. The ETF is passively managed using representative sampling and holds approximately 170-180 securities. Top holdings typically include Corteva (CTVA), Exxon Mobil (XOM), BHP Group, Nutrien (NTR), Shell, Chevron (CVX), and Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM). Sector allocations emphasize materials, energy, and consumer staples, with geographic exposure spanning the United States, Canada, Australia, and other developed and emerging markets. GUNR maintains a net expense ratio of 0.46% and distributes dividends quarterly. Its distinguishing features include broad thematic diversification and a market-capitalization approach that favors larger producers.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

XME seeks to track the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, which represents the metals and mining segment of the S&P Total Market Index and includes sub-industries such as aluminum, coal, copper, diversified metals, gold, silver, and steel. The ETF is passively managed with a sampling strategy and holds approximately 39 securities in an equal-weighted format. Top holdings commonly feature Uranium Energy (UEC), Hecla Mining (HL), Centrus Energy (LEU), Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Newmont (NEM), Royal Gold (RGLD), and various steel producers. The fund is overwhelmingly U.S.-focused, with nearly all assets in domestic companies, and maintains a net expense ratio of 0.35%. XME’s equal-weight methodology and narrow industry focus distinguish it as a targeted vehicle for U.S. mining and metals cyclical exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the natural resources and basic materials sectors, which are influenced by global commodity demand, supply constraints, energy transition policies, and infrastructure spending. Key macro drivers include industrial production trends, geopolitical developments affecting mining output, and shifts in energy and metals prices. Regulatory changes around environmental standards and permitting can affect project timelines for producers held in both funds. Capital flows into these areas often respond to broader economic growth expectations and inventory cycles rather than short-term events. Risks include commodity price volatility, regulatory hurdles, and sensitivity to interest rate environments that influence capital-intensive mining operations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, GUNR’s broader global and multi-commodity exposure has provided different volatility characteristics compared with XME’s concentrated U.S. metals focus. GUNR’s inclusion of energy and agricultural producers can moderate swings tied to pure metals prices, while XME’s equal-weighted structure amplifies moves in smaller mining names during sector rotations. Performance differentials often stem from commodity-specific trends, such as strength in industrial metals versus energy or agriculture, and from geographic factors affecting U.S. versus international producers. Both ETFs exhibit higher volatility than broad equity benchmarks during periods of commodity uncertainty, with relative positioning influenced by earnings cycles of top holdings and macroeconomic shifts in demand.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like GUNR and XME can leverage this platform to refine their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to XME due to its lower expense ratio, equal-weighted diversification within a focused theme, and alignment with potential domestic metals momentum. GUNR remains attractive for investors prioritizing broader global natural resources diversification and higher dividend yield potential. The assessment reflects cost efficiency, holdings concentration trade-offs, and thematic consistency rather than any guarantee of future results.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GUNR vs. XME commentary
Sep 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GUNR is a Hold and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GUNR has more net assets: 7.3B vs. XME (4.48B). GUNR has a higher annual dividend yield than XME: GUNR (21.859) vs XME (5.117). GUNR was incepted earlier than XME: GUNR (15 years) vs XME (20 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than GUNR (0.46). XME has a higher turnover GUNR (28.00) vs GUNR (28.00).
GUNRXMEGUNR / XME
Gain YTD21.8595.117427%
Net Assets7.3B4.48B163%
Total Expense Ratio0.460.35131%
Turnover28.0045.0062%
Yield2.160.32685%
Fund Existence15 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GUNRXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GUNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFXF17.590.02
+0.11%
VanEck Pref Secs ex Fincls ETF
ACSI78.15N/A
N/A
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
GDEC40.44-0.10
-0.25%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Dec
FCA26.76-0.37
-1.38%
First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF
TTOP18.07-0.80
-4.26%
21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF

XME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XME
1D Price
Change %
XME100%
-0.61%
CDE - XME
77%
Closely correlated
-4.67%
MP - XME
71%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
NEM - XME
71%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
CLF - XME
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
CMP - XME
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
More