GUSH
Price
$31.96
Change
+$1.32 (+4.31%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
196.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IFED
Price
$44.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 7, 02:33 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
73.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GUSH vs IFED

GUSH vs IFED Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) vs. ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED)

Key Takeaways

  • Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) seeking 200% of the daily performance of an energy sector index, while ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) is an exchange-traded note (ETN) tracking a rules-based large-cap U.S. equity index.
  • GUSH provides concentrated exposure to oil and gas exploration and production companies with approximately 50-60 holdings and a 0.94% expense ratio, whereas IFED offers broad large-cap equity exposure through a Fed-policy-informed selection process at a lower 0.45% expense ratio.
  • The ETFs differ significantly in risk profile: GUSH employs daily leverage that amplifies volatility within the energy sector, while IFED uses a systematic active strategy without leverage but carries issuer credit risk as an ETN.
  • Sector allocation in GUSH is overwhelmingly focused on energy (primarily exploration and production), in contrast to IFED’s diversified large-cap U.S. equity mandate spanning multiple sectors.
  • Structural differences include GUSH’s passive leveraged approach versus IFED’s rules-based methodology incorporating Federal Reserve signals and firm fundamentals, leading to distinct performance drivers and rebalancing needs.
  • Investors comparing the two must weigh GUSH’s higher costs and leverage against IFED’s lower fees and broader diversification within U.S. equities.

Introduction

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) represent contrasting approaches to equity market exposure. GUSH delivers leveraged daily results tied to the energy sector, while IFED pursues a systematic large-cap strategy influenced by monetary policy signals. These funds do not compete directly; instead, they offer alternative strategies for investors seeking either sector-specific amplification or rules-based broad-market participation. Comparing them highlights differences in leverage, thematic focus, cost, and structural risk that matter for portfolio construction in varying market environments.

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index. The fund holds approximately 50-60 securities, primarily equal-weighted positions in oil and gas exploration and production companies. Top holdings typically include names such as APA Corporation, Venture Global, SM Energy, and Murphy Oil. Sector allocation is concentrated in energy, with roughly 70% in exploration and production, 22% in refining and marketing, and the balance in integrated oil and gas. The expense ratio stands at 0.94%. As a leveraged ETF, it resets daily and is designed for short-term trading rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies. Liquidity is supported by average daily volumes in the hundreds of thousands of shares.

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) Overview

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) is an exchange-traded note that seeks to track the performance of the IFED Large-Cap U.S. Equity Index Total Return, less a tracking fee. The index employs a rules-based methodology that incorporates Federal Reserve policy signals and key firm metrics to select and weight large-cap U.S. equities. The ETN does not hold underlying securities directly; instead, it represents an unsecured obligation of the issuer, UBS. The expense ratio is 0.45%. Because it follows an index with dynamic selection, the number of holdings and specific top positions vary with market conditions and policy signals. The strategy targets broad large-cap exposure without leverage, emphasizing companies positioned to benefit from prevailing economic and monetary conditions.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The energy sector, central to GUSH, faces ongoing influence from commodity price cycles, global supply dynamics, and the pace of the energy transition. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate paths, inflation trends, and geopolitical developments continue to shape capital flows into exploration and production activities. Meanwhile, IFED’s large-cap U.S. equity focus aligns with broader equity market sentiment driven by corporate earnings, Federal Reserve policy decisions, and sector rotation across technology, financials, and consumer areas. Regulatory developments around energy policy and monetary easing or tightening cycles remain key catalysts affecting both funds’ underlying themes, though in markedly different ways given their distinct exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GUSH has exhibited significantly higher volatility due to its 2x daily leverage and concentrated energy exposure, amplifying moves tied to oil price fluctuations and sector-specific earnings. IFED, by contrast, has delivered more moderate volatility consistent with large-cap U.S. equities, with performance influenced by the index’s Fed-signal-driven stock selection. Relative positioning shows GUSH benefiting during strong energy rallies but suffering amplified drawdowns, while IFED’s systematic approach has aimed for more consistent participation across market regimes. Differences in rebalancing frequency and leverage mechanics further distinguish their responses to interest rate expectations and macroeconomic shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities across sectors and strategies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The lower expense ratio, absence of daily leverage, and rules-based large-cap diversification provide a more balanced risk-adjusted profile for most market environments compared with the higher-cost, concentrated, and leveraged energy exposure of Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH).

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GUSH vs. IFED commentary
Jul 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GUSH is a Hold and IFED is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GUSH has more net assets: 197M vs. IFED (73.1M). GUSH has a higher annual dividend yield than IFED: GUSH (40.741) vs IFED (-3.414). GUSH was incepted earlier than IFED: GUSH (11 years) vs IFED (5 years).
GUSHIFEDGUSH / IFED
Gain YTD40.741-3.414-1,193%
Net Assets197M73.1M269%
Total Expense Ratio0.94N/A-
Turnover60.00N/A-
Yield1.560.00-
Fund Existence11 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GUSHIFED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GUSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IFED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GURAX36.76N/A
N/A
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate A
MSOCX29.31N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp C
DURPX29.83N/A
N/A
DFA US Hi Relatv Profitability Instl
LHCFX24.46N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Health Care F
MDCIX16.97N/A
N/A
Madison Mid Cap I

GUSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GUSH has been closely correlated with MGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GUSH jumps, then MGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GUSH
1D Price
Change %
GUSH100%
-0.91%
MGY - GUSH
88%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
OVV - GUSH
88%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
DVN - GUSH
86%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
MTDR - GUSH
86%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
EOG - GUSH
85%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
More