Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVALX vs RMFCX
GVALX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GVALX vs RMFCX
GVALX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVALX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVALX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GVALX (32M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GVALX: RMFCX (1.16) vs GVALX (0.80). GVALX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GVALX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GVALX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GVALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GVALX: RMFCX (250) vs GVALX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. GVALX (7.20). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. GVALX (-0.65).
| GVALX | RMFCX | GVALX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.091 | 9.137 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 8.88 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.80 | 34.84 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.65 | 37.23 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.39 | 91.06 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement