GVLMF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.77M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HMENF
Price
$1.55
Change
+$0.03 (+1.97%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
149.66M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GVLMF vs HMENF

Header iconGVLMF vs HMENF Comparison
Open Charts GVLMF vs HMENFBanner chart's image
Greenvale Energy
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$141
Capitalization14.77M
Hemisphere Energy
Price$1.55
Change+$0.03 (+1.97%)
Volume$20.26K
Capitalization149.66M
GVLMF vs HMENF Comparison Chart in %
GVLMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HMENF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GVLMF vs. HMENF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVLMF is a Hold and HMENF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (GVLMF: $0.03 vs. HMENF: $1.56)
Brand notoriety: GVLMF and HMENF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GVLMF: 82% vs. HMENF: 40%
Market capitalization -- GVLMF: $14.77M vs. HMENF: $149.66M
GVLMF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $14.77M. HMENF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $149.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $108.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GVLMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHMENF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • GVLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HMENF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, HMENF is a better buy in the long-term than GVLMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GVLMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HMENF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GVLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HMENF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HMENF is a better buy in the short-term than GVLMF.

Price Growth

GVLMF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HMENF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMENF is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.10% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMENF($150M) has a higher market cap than GVLMF($14.8M). HMENF YTD gains are higher at: 21.563 vs. GVLMF (-50.000). HMENF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 54.1M vs. GVLMF (-1.51M).
GVLMFHMENFGVLMF / HMENF
Capitalization14.8M150M10%
EBITDA-1.51M54.1M-3%
Gain YTD-50.00021.563-232%
P/E RatioN/A6.83-
RevenueN/A102M-
Total CashN/A23.2M-
Total DebtN/A3.42M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GVLMF vs HMENF: Fundamental Ratings
GVLMF
HMENF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
253
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9718
SMR RATING
1..100
9322
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10031
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMENF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as GVLMF (40). This means that HMENF’s stock grew similarly to GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

HMENF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GVLMF (97). This means that HMENF’s stock grew significantly faster than GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

HMENF's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GVLMF (93). This means that HMENF’s stock grew significantly faster than GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

HMENF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GVLMF (57). This means that HMENF’s stock grew similarly to GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

HMENF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GVLMF (100). This means that HMENF’s stock grew significantly faster than GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GVLMFHMENF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GVLMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HMENF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNAL0.910.03
+3.92%
Snail
BTSG32.270.72
+2.28%
BrightSpring Health Services
CTS41.930.58
+1.40%
CTS Corp
OPFI9.460.08
+0.85%
OppFi
WELL196.90-1.39
-0.70%
Welltower

HMENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMENF has been loosely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMENF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMENF
1D Price
Change %
HMENF100%
+0.52%
ZPTAF - HMENF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
CDDRF - HMENF
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
MEGEF - HMENF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VET - HMENF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
OVV - HMENF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More