Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVTFX vs RMAFX
GVTFX vs RMAFX Comparison
Open Charts GVTFX vs RMAFX
GVTFX vs RMAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVTFX vs. RMAFX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVTFX is a Hold and RMAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GVTFX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. RMAFX (13B). RMAFX (4.51) and GVTFX (4.36) have matching dividends . GVTFX was incepted earlier than RMAFX: GVTFX (18 years) vs RMAFX (16 years). GVTFX (0.36) is less costly to investors than RMAFX (0.32). RMAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GVTFX (50.00). GVTFX (250) and RMAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.71 vs. GVTFX (1.72). RMAFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.09 vs. GVTFX (-1.02).
| GVTFX | RMAFX | GVTFX / RMAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.32 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.32 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.119 | -0.670 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 13B | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.36 | 4.51 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.72 | 2.71 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.96 | 14.98 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.02 | 2.09 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.94 | 11.05 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement