Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVTFX vs RMAFX
GVTFX vs RMAFX Comparison
Open Charts GVTFX vs RMAFX
GVTFX vs RMAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVTFX vs. RMAFX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVTFX is a Hold and RMAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GVTFX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. RMAFX (13.1B). RMAFX pays higher dividends than GVTFX: RMAFX (4.53) vs GVTFX (4.28). GVTFX was incepted earlier than RMAFX: GVTFX (18 years) vs RMAFX (16 years). GVTFX (0.36) is less costly to investors than RMAFX (0.32). RMAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GVTFX (50.00). GVTFX (250) and RMAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.31 vs. GVTFX (4.23). RMAFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.23 vs. GVTFX (0.93).
| GVTFX | RMAFX | GVTFX / RMAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.32 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.32 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.240 | 0.012 | -1,935% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 13.1B | 185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.28 | 4.53 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.23 | 5.31 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.80 | 12.35 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.93 | 3.23 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.81 | 12.06 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers