Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVTFX vs RMAFX
GVTFX vs RMAFX Comparison
Open Charts GVTFX vs RMAFX
GVTFX vs RMAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVTFX vs. RMAFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVTFX is a Hold and RMAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GVTFX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. RMAFX (12.9B). RMAFX (4.46) and GVTFX (4.30) have matching dividends . GVTFX was incepted earlier than RMAFX: GVTFX (18 years) vs RMAFX (16 years). GVTFX (0.36) is less costly to investors than RMAFX (0.32). RMAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GVTFX (50.00). GVTFX (250) and RMAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.25 vs. GVTFX (-0.43). RMAFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.43 vs. GVTFX (-1.64).
| GVTFX | RMAFX | GVTFX / RMAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.32 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.32 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.497 | -1.247 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 12.9B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.30 | 4.46 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | 0.25 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.95 | 13.60 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.64 | 1.43 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.60 | 10.21 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement