Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWILX vs RMEBX
GWILX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GWILX vs RMEBX
GWILX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWILX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWILX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GWILX (3.45M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GWILX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GWILX (0.25). GWILX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GWILX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GWILX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GWILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GWILX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GWILX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. GWILX (-47.47). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. GWILX (-52.10).
| GWILX | RMEBX | GWILX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.314 | 8.448 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.45M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.99 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -47.47 | 4.65 | -1,021% |
| Returns for 3 years | -39.60 | 34.88 | -114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -52.10 | 34.68 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.75 | 92.45 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers