Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWILX vs RMEBX
GWILX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GWILX vs RMEBX
GWILX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWILX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWILX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. GWILX (3.64M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GWILX: RMEBX (1.04) vs GWILX (0.43). GWILX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GWILX (10 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GWILX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GWILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GWILX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GWILX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. GWILX (-41.43). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. GWILX (-51.11).
| GWILX | RMEBX | GWILX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.877 | 5.801 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.64M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.04 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -41.43 | 9.98 | -415% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.66 | 34.14 | -104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.11 | 32.93 | -155% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.65 | 89.84 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement