Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWILX vs RMFCX
GWILX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GWILX vs RMFCX
GWILX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWILX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWILX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GWILX (3.55M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GWILX: RMFCX (1.16) vs GWILX (0.42). GWILX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GWILX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GWILX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GWILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GWILX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GWILX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. GWILX (-42.74). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. GWILX (-50.62).
| GWILX | RMFCX | GWILX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.797 | 9.137 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.55M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.16 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -42.74 | 8.88 | -482% |
| Returns for 3 years | -38.41 | 34.84 | -110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.62 | 37.23 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.08 | 91.06 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement