Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWILX vs RMFEX
GWILX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GWILX vs RMFEX
GWILX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWILX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWILX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GWILX (3.55M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GWILX: RMFEX (1.42) vs GWILX (0.42). GWILX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GWILX (11 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). GWILX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GWILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). GWILX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: GWILX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. GWILX (-42.74). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. GWILX (-50.62).
| GWILX | RMFEX | GWILX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.62 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.62 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.797 | 9.303 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.55M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.42 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -42.74 | 9.23 | -463% |
| Returns for 3 years | -38.41 | 36.13 | -106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.62 | 39.39 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.08 | 99.14 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement