Advertisement
HAFN vs TORO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAFN is a Buy and TORO is a Hold.
| HAFN | TORO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 25 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HAFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TORO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HAFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TORO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HAFN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TORO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HAFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TORO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HAFN (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +12.89% price change this week, while TORO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -3.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
HAFN is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (-0.32% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.25% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSJW | 24.25 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) | |||
| IQSZ | 32.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | |||
| AQEC | 25.46 | -0.12 | -0.47% |
| AQE Core ETF (AQEC) | |||
| GPIX | 55.52 | -0.31 | -0.56% |
| Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) | |||
| LEUX | 7.14 | -0.04 | -0.56% |
| Tradr 2X Long LEU Daily ETF (LEUX) | |||
TORO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TORO has been loosely correlated with GNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TORO jumps, then GNK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TORO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TORO | 100% | -8.40% | ||
| GNK - TORO | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.05% | ||
| NMM - TORO | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| ASC - TORO | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.16% | ||
| DAC - TORO | 28% Poorly correlated | +4.81% | ||
| HAFN - TORO | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||