HALFF
Price
$124.00
Change
-$1.00 (-0.80%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
11.3B
SEIC
Price
$69.02
Change
-$4.47 (-6.08%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HALFF vs SEIC

Header iconHALFF vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts HALFF vs SEICBanner chart's image
Hal Trust
Price$124.00
Change-$1.00 (-0.80%)
Volume$2.13K
Capitalization11.3B
SEI Investments
Price$69.02
Change-$4.47 (-6.08%)
Volume$920.37K
Capitalization9.3B
HALFF vs SEIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HALFF vs. SEIC commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HALFF is a Hold and SEIC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HALFF: $124.00 vs. SEIC: $69.02)
Brand notoriety: HALFF and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HALFF: 186% vs. SEIC: 123%
Market capitalization -- HALFF: $11.3B vs. SEIC: $9.3B
HALFF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $11.3B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HALFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HALFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than HALFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SEIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SEIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

HALFF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.81% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -10.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HALFF($11.3B) has a higher market cap than SEIC($9.3B). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than HALFF: SEIC (20.47) vs HALFF (15.36). HALFF YTD gains are higher at: 4.421 vs. SEIC (-16.319). HALFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.24B vs. SEIC (669M). HALFF has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. SEIC (866M). SEIC has less debt than HALFF: SEIC (25.4M) vs HALFF (5.25B). HALFF has higher revenues than SEIC: HALFF (7.79B) vs SEIC (1.92B).
HALFFSEICHALFF / SEIC
Capitalization11.3B9.3B121%
EBITDA5.24B669M784%
Gain YTD4.421-16.319-27%
P/E Ratio15.3620.4775%
Revenue7.79B1.92B406%
Total Cash5.88B866M679%
Total Debt5.25B25.4M20,669%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HALFF vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
HALFF
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
9637
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5473
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7266
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HALFF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (85) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that HALFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HALFF (100) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew significantly faster than HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (37) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HALFF (96) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SEIC (73) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that HALFF’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HALFF (72) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRVFX38.11-1.72
-4.32%
Franklin Small Cap Value C
ICMPX15.27-0.79
-4.92%
Lazard International Quality Gr Instl
RTXCX11.13-0.69
-5.84%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets C
SHXIX12.01-0.76
-5.95%
American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opps R5
RWIEX57.78-3.70
-6.02%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R4

HALFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HALFF and IVSBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HALFF and IVSBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HALFF
1D Price
Change %
HALFF100%
-0.80%
IVSBF - HALFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
CG - HALFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.28%
TROW - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
BUR - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.58%
SEIC - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.08%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
-6.08%
BN - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
-8.16%
TROW - SEIC
72%
Closely correlated
-4.20%
AMG - SEIC
69%
Closely correlated
-5.87%
BAM - SEIC
69%
Closely correlated
-6.01%
STT - SEIC
69%
Closely correlated
-7.94%
More