Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HAPS vs SMMD
HAPS vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts HAPS vs SMMD
HAPS vs SMMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HAPS vs. SMMD commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPS is a Hold and SMMD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 3.85B vs. HAPS (177M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than HAPS: SMMD (23.176) vs HAPS (20.270). HAPS was incepted earlier than SMMD: HAPS (3 years) vs SMMD (9 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than HAPS (0.61). HAPS has a higher turnover SMMD (8.00) vs SMMD (8.00).
| HAPS | SMMD | HAPS / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | 20.270 | 23.176 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 177M | 3.85B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.15 | 407% |
| Turnover | 75.00 | 8.00 | 938% |
| Yield | 0.48 | 1.07 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HAPS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
HAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAPS has been closely correlated with WAFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAPS jumps, then WAFD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| WAFD - HAPS | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PIPR - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| WSBC - HAPS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| HRI - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| TOWN - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||