HAS
Price
$53.96
Change
-$1.03 (-1.87%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.84B
17 days until earnings call
MAT
Price
$16.45
Change
-$0.13 (-0.78%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.81B
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HAS vs MAT

Header iconHAS vs MAT Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs MATBanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$53.96
Change-$1.03 (-1.87%)
Volume$3.04M
Capitalization7.84B
Mattel
Price$16.45
Change-$0.13 (-0.78%)
Volume$10.12M
Capitalization6.81B
HAS vs MAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. MAT commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Hold and MAT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HAS: $53.96 vs. MAT: $16.45)
Brand notoriety: HAS and MAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 163% vs. MAT: 225%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $7.84B vs. MAT: $6.81B
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $7.84B. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $6.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than MAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAT is a better buy in the short-term than HAS.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -10.94% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was -14.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -6.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

MAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-6.63% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($7.84B) has a higher market cap than MAT($6.82B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than MAT: HAS (75.76) vs MAT (32.81). HAS YTD gains are higher at: -2.439 vs. MAT (-7.219). MAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 767M vs. HAS (-863.2M). MAT has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. HAS (545M). MAT has less debt than HAS: MAT (2.59B) vs HAS (3.5B). MAT has higher revenues than HAS: MAT (5.44B) vs HAS (5B).
HASMATHAS / MAT
Capitalization7.84B6.82B115%
EBITDA-863.2M767M-113%
Gain YTD-2.439-7.21934%
P/E Ratio75.7632.81231%
Revenue5B5.44B92%
Total Cash545M1.26B43%
Total Debt3.5B2.59B135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS vs MAT: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9245
SMR RATING
1..100
2839
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6178
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (17) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (79). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (92). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's SMR Rating (28) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (39). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (78). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (97). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QGRW41.98N/A
N/A
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth ETF
PWS30.67-0.04
-0.13%
Pacer WealthShield ETF
DALI21.62-1.39
-6.05%
First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF
IQLT36.93-2.42
-6.15%
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
UWM27.34-2.72
-9.05%
ProShares Ultra Russell2000

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
-1.87%
MAT - HAS
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
BC - HAS
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
PII - HAS
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
JAKK - HAS
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.93%
GOLF - HAS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
More

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with HAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then HAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
-0.78%
HAS - MAT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
JAKK - MAT
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.93%
GOLF - MAT
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
BC - MAT
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
PII - MAT
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More