HAS
Price
$81.13
Change
+$0.58 (+0.72%)
Updated
Aug 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.38B
68 days until earnings call
MAT
Price
$18.19
Change
-$0.09 (-0.49%)
Updated
Aug 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.86B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs MAT

Header iconHAS vs MAT Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs MATBanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$81.13
Change+$0.58 (+0.72%)
Volume$23.73K
Capitalization11.38B
Mattel
Price$18.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.49%)
Volume$76.48K
Capitalization5.86B
HAS vs MAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. MAT commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Hold and MAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (HAS: $81.14 vs. MAT: $18.18)
Brand notoriety: HAS and MAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 61% vs. MAT: 69%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $11.38B vs. MAT: $5.86B
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $11.38B. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $5.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $39.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than MAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the short-term than MAT.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was +6.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

MAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.21% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($11.4B) has a higher market cap than MAT($5.86B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than MAT: HAS (25.60) vs MAT (11.81). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 48.221 vs. MAT (2.538). MAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 959M vs. HAS (-81.2M). MAT has more cash in the bank: 870M vs. HAS (547M). MAT has less debt than HAS: MAT (2.68B) vs HAS (3.35B). MAT has higher revenues than HAS: MAT (5.34B) vs HAS (4.25B).
HASMATHAS / MAT
Capitalization11.4B5.86B195%
EBITDA-81.2M959M-8%
Gain YTD48.2212.5381,900%
P/E Ratio25.6011.81217%
Revenue4.25B5.34B80%
Total Cash547M870M63%
Total Debt3.35B2.68B125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS vs MAT: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7359
SMR RATING
1..100
9838
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1079
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (21) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAT (90). This means that HAS’s stock grew significantly faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (73). This means that MAT’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's SMR Rating (38) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (98). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAT (79). This means that HAS’s stock grew significantly faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (93). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEMPX376.16N/A
N/A
Vanguard Extended Market Index InstlPlus
CCALX73.56N/A
N/A
Conestoga Small Cap Institutional
SCJCX7.85N/A
N/A
Steward Covered Call Income C
GSMSX36.53N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Svc
SSVIX22.62N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst2

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+0.73%
MAT - HAS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
JAKK - HAS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
YETI - HAS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
JOUT - HAS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
FNKO - HAS
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.91%
More

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with HAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then HAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
-0.55%
HAS - MAT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
JAKK - MAT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
YETI - MAT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
AS - MAT
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
FNKO - MAT
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.91%
More