Ad is loading...
HAS
Price
$62.21
Change
-$0.85 (-1.35%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
93 days until earnings call
MAT
Price
$18.67
Change
-$0.32 (-1.69%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HAS vs MAT

Header iconHAS vs MAT Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs MATBanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$62.21
Change-$0.85 (-1.35%)
Volume$1.17M
CapitalizationN/A
Mattel
Price$18.67
Change-$0.32 (-1.69%)
Volume$2.69M
CapitalizationN/A
HAS vs MAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. MAT commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Sell and MAT is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HAS: $62.21 vs. MAT: $18.67)
Brand notoriety: HAS and MAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 85% vs. MAT: 103%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $7.84B vs. MAT: $6.81B
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $7.84B. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $6.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HAS and MAT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the short-term than MAT.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -3.37% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

MAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-5.12% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($7.84B) has a higher market cap than MAT($6.82B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than MAT: HAS (75.76) vs MAT (32.81). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 26.245 vs. MAT (-1.112). MAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 767M vs. HAS (-863.2M). MAT has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. HAS (545M). MAT has less debt than HAS: MAT (2.59B) vs HAS (3.5B). MAT has higher revenues than HAS: MAT (5.44B) vs HAS (5B).
HASMATHAS / MAT
Capitalization7.84B6.82B115%
EBITDA-863.2M767M-113%
Gain YTD26.245-1.112-2,360%
P/E Ratio75.7632.81231%
Revenue5B5.44B92%
Total Cash545M1.26B43%
Total Debt3.5B2.59B135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS vs MAT: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6233
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
9439
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (20) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (78). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (100). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's SMR Rating (39) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (94). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (56). This means that MAT’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAT (100). This means that HAS’s stock grew significantly faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXA63.940.08
+0.12%
Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust
CDC65.420.02
+0.03%
VictoryShares US EQ Inc Enh Vol Wtd ETF
TEMP46.53-0.29
-0.62%
JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF
FNK55.45-0.36
-0.65%
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX® ETF
CALF46.34-0.52
-1.11%
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with PII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then PII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
-1.35%
PII - HAS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
MAT - HAS
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
BC - HAS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
MODG - HAS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
LCII - HAS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with HAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then HAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
-1.69%
HAS - MAT
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
WGO - MAT
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
THO - MAT
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
MODG - MAT
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
BC - MAT
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More