HAS
Price
$88.97
Change
-$1.34 (-1.48%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
12.55B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAT
Price
$13.76
Change
-$0.38 (-2.69%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.93B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs MAT

HAS vs MAT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. MAT commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Buy and MAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 10, 2026
Stock price -- (HAS: $88.97 vs. MAT: $13.76)
Brand notoriety: HAS and MAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 50% vs. MAT: 95%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $12.55B vs. MAT: $3.93B
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $12.55B. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $3.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $27.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than MAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the short-term than MAT.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -4.84% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was -6.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

MAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-2.43% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($12.6B) has a higher market cap than MAT($3.93B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than MAT: HAS (15.83) vs MAT (10.28). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 10.969 vs. MAT (-30.645). HAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. MAT (803M). HAS has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. MAT (524M). MAT has less debt than HAS: MAT (2.75B) vs HAS (3.57B). MAT has higher revenues than HAS: MAT (5.49B) vs HAS (4.97B).
HASMATHAS / MAT
Capitalization12.6B3.93B320%
EBITDA1.36B803M169%
Gain YTD10.969-30.645-36%
P/E Ratio15.8310.28154%
Revenue4.97B5.49B91%
Total Cash1.38B524M263%
Total Debt3.57B2.75B130%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS vs MAT: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6964
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
1146
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5071
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4160
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (59) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (80). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (100). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's SMR Rating (11) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (46). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (71). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (60). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBTY21.60-0.01
-0.05%
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF-July
IGA10.51-0.02
-0.19%
Voya Global Advantage AND Premium Opportunity Fund
BLCR49.40-0.20
-0.40%
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF
FDEM37.00-0.21
-0.57%
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
CVAR30.91-0.28
-0.89%
Cultivar ETF

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAS and FNKO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAS and FNKO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
-1.48%
FNKO - HAS
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.11%
JAKK - HAS
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
LTH - HAS
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
JOUT - HAS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
MAT - HAS
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
More