HAS
Price
$93.56
Change
+$0.23 (+0.25%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
13.16B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAT
Price
$14.72
Change
+$0.19 (+1.31%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.15B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs MAT

HAS vs MAT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. MAT commentary
Aug 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Hold and MAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 21, 2026
Stock price -- (HAS: $93.33 vs. MAT: $14.53)
Brand notoriety: HAS and MAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 47% vs. MAT: 55%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $13.16B vs. MAT: $4.15B
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $13.16B. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $4.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $27.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $2.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than MAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAT is a better buy in the short-term than HAS.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

MAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+0.45% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($13.2B) has a higher market cap than MAT($4.15B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than MAT: HAS (16.65) vs MAT (10.99). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 16.407 vs. MAT (-26.764). HAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. MAT (890M). MAT has less debt than HAS: MAT (2.68B) vs HAS (3.57B). MAT has higher revenues than HAS: MAT (5.38B) vs HAS (4.97B).
HASMATHAS / MAT
Capitalization13.2B4.15B318%
EBITDA1.36B890M152%
Gain YTD16.407-26.764-61%
P/E Ratio16.6510.99151%
Revenue4.97B5.38B92%
Total CashN/A866M-
Total Debt3.57B2.68B133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS vs MAT: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3612
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
940
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4254
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (62) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (81). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (100). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's SMR Rating (9) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (40). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (61). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (54). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COPX88.282.71
+3.17%
Global X Copper Miners ETF
IEUS73.610.79
+1.09%
iShares MSCI Europe Small-Cap ETF
DAT49.470.49
+1.01%
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
VMO9.740.04
+0.41%
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust
FEBM31.58N/A
+0.02%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Feb

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAS and FNKO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAS and FNKO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+0.04%
FNKO - HAS
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
JAKK - HAS
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
LTH - HAS
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
JOUT - HAS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
YETI - HAS
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
More