It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HAUP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QMCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
HAUP (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QMCO (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -25.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.44%.
HAUP is expected to report earnings on Feb 14, 2025.
QMCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
HAUP | QMCO | HAUP / QMCO | |
Capitalization | 709K | 56.6M | 1% |
EBITDA | -1.82M | -14.29M | 13% |
Gain YTD | 20.792 | -53.009 | -39% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 24M | 407M | 6% |
Total Cash | 1.46M | 25.5M | 6% |
Total Debt | N/A | 111M | - |
HAUP | QMCO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QMCO's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as HAUP (29). This means that QMCO’s stock grew similarly to HAUP’s over the last 12 months.
QMCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HAUP (100). This means that QMCO’s stock grew similarly to HAUP’s over the last 12 months.
QMCO's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HAUP (100). This means that QMCO’s stock grew similarly to HAUP’s over the last 12 months.
HAUP's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as QMCO (93). This means that HAUP’s stock grew similarly to QMCO’s over the last 12 months.
HAUP's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QMCO (100). This means that HAUP’s stock grew similarly to QMCO’s over the last 12 months.
QMCO | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAUP has been loosely correlated with VRTK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAUP jumps, then VRTK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAUP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HAUP | 100% | N/A | ||
VRTK - HAUP | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
DRSHF - HAUP | 10% Poorly correlated | -5.05% | ||
CAN - HAUP | 7% Poorly correlated | +11.49% | ||
CREAF - HAUP | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QMCO - HAUP | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QMCO and RGTI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QMCO and RGTI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QMCO | 100% | +2.82% | ||
RGTI - QMCO | 29% Poorly correlated | -9.03% | ||
CAN - QMCO | 26% Poorly correlated | +11.49% | ||
IONQ - QMCO | 25% Poorly correlated | +11.39% | ||
STX - QMCO | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
PSTG - QMCO | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.29% | ||
More |