QBTS
Price
$22.57
Change
+$0.58 (+2.64%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.36B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QMCO
Price
$9.62
Change
+$0.49 (+5.37%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
140.38M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBTS vs QMCO

Header iconQBTS vs QMCO Comparison
Open Charts QBTS vs QMCOBanner chart's image
QBTS vs QMCO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) vs. Quantum Corporation (QMCO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) boasts a market cap of approximately $8.36 billion, dwarfing Quantum Corporation's (QMCO) $141 million, reflecting stronger investor interest in quantum computing pure-plays.
  • QMCO has delivered superior YTD returns of 49.15% versus QBTS's 13.69%, driven by recent storage demand amid AI data growth.
  • Both stocks exhibit high volatility with betas above 1.9 (QBTS at 1.95, QMCO at 2.91), but QBTS shows over 50% gains in recent weeks on acquisition news and sector momentum.
  • QBTS reported 179% revenue growth in fiscal 2025 to $24.6 million, fueled by system sales, while QMCO posted Q3 FY2026 revenue of $74.6 million with improving margins.
  • Recent market activity highlights QBTS's momentum from Quantum Circuits acquisition and upcoming Q1 earnings, contrasting QMCO's steadier gains from partnerships in cold storage.
  • Over one year, QBTS returned 116.60%, outperforming QMCO's 15.98%, underscoring quantum hype versus established storage plays.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving technology landscape, D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) and Quantum Corporation (QMCO) represent distinct approaches to data-intensive innovation. QBTS pioneers quantum annealing systems for optimization problems, while QMCO delivers scale-out storage solutions for AI, video, and unstructured data. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance, and growth drivers, aiding traders seeking high-beta tech exposure and investors evaluating quantum-adjacent themes amid AI-driven demand. Relative performance highlights trade-offs between speculative quantum upside and proven storage stability.

QBTS Overview and Recent Performance

D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS), based in Palo Alto, California, develops quantum computing systems, software, and services, including the Advantage annealing platforms and Leap cloud access. The company targets optimization challenges in logistics, drug discovery, and portfolio management. In recent market activity, QBTS shares have surged over 50% in the past month, trading around $22.57 with a $8.36 billion market cap. This momentum stems from fiscal 2025 revenue doubling 179% to $24.6 million, driven by system sales and a 1,500% sales pipeline expansion, alongside the $550 million acquisition of Quantum Circuits Inc. for gate-model tech. Sentiment has shifted positively on commercial traction and upcoming Q1 2026 earnings on May 12, though high beta (1.95) amplifies volatility from sector hype and cash burn concerns.

QMCO Overview and Recent Performance

Quantum Corporation (QMCO), headquartered in Centennial, Colorado, specializes in storage for unstructured data, offering ActiveScale object storage, DXi backup appliances, and software like StorNext for AI, surveillance, and media workflows. Recent weeks have seen QMCO shares climb around 50% monthly to $9.62, with a $141 million market cap and YTD gains of 49.15%. Performance reflects Q3 FY2026 revenue of $74.6 million (up sequentially), positive adjusted EBITDA, and 29% subscription ARR growth, bolstered by partnerships like Pink Elephant for sovereign cold storage. Investor sentiment benefits from AI data demands, though elevated beta (2.91) and debt levels introduce risks amid ongoing losses.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots, powered by advanced AI models, deliver real-time signals for copy trading in stocks, ETFs, and crypto, with standout stats including annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 70-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70. Selected for best performance in current market volatility, they span timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, employing trend analysis, multi-agent systems, and risk-managed exits like 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors. Sectors range from semiconductors and AI infrastructure to space and leveraged ETFs. Explore these high-conviction bots tailored to today’s conditions and consider integrating them into your trading arsenal.

Head-to-Head Comparison

QBTS and QMCO diverge sharply in business models: QBTS’s quantum annealing targets exponential optimization growth in enterprise apps, contrasting QMCO’s mature scale-out storage for AI/ML data lakes. Growth drivers favor QBTS’s triple-digit revenue surge and hybrid quantum-classical catalysts, while QMCO leverages steady ARR from subscriptions amid exploding unstructured data needs. Recent momentum tilts to QBTS (116% one-year return) on acquisitions, versus QMCO’s YTD outperformance but longer-term lags. Risks include QBTS’s pre-profitability and competition in nascent quantum, against QMCO’s debt and commoditized storage pressures. Both expose to tech/AI, but sentiment favors QBTS’s disruptive narrative over QMCO’s execution focus.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors QBTS due to superior trend consistency in quantum momentum, recent catalysts like acquisitions, and relative positioning with a multi-billion market cap versus QMCO. Observable factors such as 179% revenue growth and pipeline expansion suggest higher probabilistic upside in volatile tech conditions, though QMCO offers stability via established revenues.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
QBTS vs. QMCO commentary
May 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBTS is a Hold and QMCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2026
Stock price -- (QBTS: $22.57 vs. QMCO: $9.62)
Brand notoriety: QBTS and QMCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBTS: 83% vs. QMCO: 113%
Market capitalization -- QBTS: $8.36B vs. QMCO: $140.38M
QBTS [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $8.36B. QMCO’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $140.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $178.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $17.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQMCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QMCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QMCO is a better buy in the long-term than QBTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBTS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QMCO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QMCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both QBTS and QMCO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +10.15% price change this week, while QMCO (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +27.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +5.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

QBTS is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (+5.81% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBTS($8.36B) has a higher market cap than QMCO($140M). QMCO YTD gains are higher at: 49.147 vs. QBTS (-13.690). QMCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -68.8M vs. QBTS (-348.74M). QBTS has more cash in the bank: 884M vs. QMCO (13.2M). QBTS has less debt than QMCO: QBTS (43.5M) vs QMCO (137M). QMCO has higher revenues than QBTS: QMCO (263M) vs QBTS (24.6M).
QBTSQMCOQBTS / QMCO
Capitalization8.36B140M5,972%
EBITDA-348.74M-68.8M507%
Gain YTD-13.69049.147-28%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue24.6M263M9%
Total Cash884M13.2M6,697%
Total Debt43.5M137M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QMCO: Fundamental Ratings
QMCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBTSQMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QBTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QMCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLYT25.737.81
+43.58%
Tradr 2X Long FLY Daily ETF
IEUS73.591.16
+1.60%
iShares MSCI Europe Small-Cap ETF
PJUL48.200.08
+0.16%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jul
FEBZ39.78N/A
N/A
TrueShares Structured OutcomeFebruaryETF
VDIG60.22-0.18
-0.29%
Vanguard Wellington Dividend Gr Actv ETF

QMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMCO has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMCO jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QMCO
1D Price
Change %
QMCO100%
+5.37%
RGTI - QMCO
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.27%
QUBT - QMCO
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
IONQ - QMCO
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.27%
QBTS - QMCO
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
AGMH - QMCO
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More