HBCP
Price
$46.51
Change
+$1.10 (+2.42%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
302.26M
8 days until earnings call
NSTS
Price
$12.00
Change
-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
50.71M
Ad is loading...

HBCP vs NSTS

Header iconHBCP vs NSTS Comparison
Open Charts HBCP vs NSTSBanner chart's image
Home Ban
Price$46.51
Change+$1.10 (+2.42%)
Volume$25.03K
Capitalization302.26M
NSTS Ban
Price$12.00
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Volume$385
Capitalization50.71M
HBCP vs NSTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCP vs. NSTS commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a Hold and NSTS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCP: $46.51 vs. NSTS: $12.00)
Brand notoriety: HBCP and NSTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCP: 131% vs. NSTS: 7%
Market capitalization -- HBCP: $302.26M vs. NSTS: $50.71M
HBCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $302.26M. NSTS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $50.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNSTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSTS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NSTS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the short-term than NSTS.

Price Growth

HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.90% price change this week, while NSTS (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

NSTS is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($302M) has a higher market cap than NSTS($50.7M). NSTS has higher P/E ratio than HBCP: NSTS (175.44) vs HBCP (7.43). NSTS YTD gains are higher at: 1.695 vs. HBCP (0.649). NSTS has less debt than HBCP: NSTS (32.8M) vs HBCP (252M). HBCP has higher revenues than NSTS: HBCP (135M) vs NSTS (4.95M).
HBCPNSTSHBCP / NSTS
Capitalization302M50.7M596%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.6491.69538%
P/E Ratio7.43175.444%
Revenue135M4.95M2,726%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt252M32.8M768%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43
SMR RATING
1..100
28
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCPNSTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGEOX17.760.17
+0.97%
Calamos Global Equity R6
NBMIX51.850.40
+0.78%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Inv
FEVIX21.770.13
+0.60%
First Eagle US Value I
HFQCX6.040.03
+0.50%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income C
CPCRX4.260.01
+0.24%
Comstock Capital Value I

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with RBCAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then RBCAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
+2.42%
RBCAA - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
THFF - HBCP
79%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
FCBC - HBCP
78%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
MOFG - HBCP
77%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
FFBC - HBCP
77%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
More

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
-0.41%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
BCH - NSTS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
CCB - NSTS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More