HBCP
Price
$43.56
Change
+$0.43 (+1.00%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
302.26M
2 days until earnings call
NSTS
Price
$11.79
Change
-$0.41 (-3.36%)
Updated
Apr 17, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.71M
Ad is loading...

HBCP vs NSTS

Header iconHBCP vs NSTS Comparison
Open Charts HBCP vs NSTSBanner chart's image
Home Ban
Price$43.56
Change+$0.43 (+1.00%)
Volume$52.87K
Capitalization302.26M
NSTS Ban
Price$11.79
Change-$0.41 (-3.36%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization50.71M
HBCP vs NSTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCP vs. NSTS commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a Hold and NSTS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCP: $43.56 vs. NSTS: $12.20)
Brand notoriety: HBCP and NSTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCP: 213% vs. NSTS: 32%
Market capitalization -- HBCP: $302.26M vs. NSTS: $50.71M
HBCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $302.26M. NSTS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $50.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNSTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HBCP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.30% price change this week, while NSTS (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

NSTS is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($302M) has a higher market cap than NSTS($50.7M). NSTS has higher P/E ratio than HBCP: NSTS (175.44) vs HBCP (7.43). NSTS YTD gains are higher at: 3.390 vs. HBCP (-5.241). NSTS has less debt than HBCP: NSTS (32.8M) vs HBCP (252M). HBCP has higher revenues than NSTS: HBCP (135M) vs NSTS (4.95M).
HBCPNSTSHBCP / NSTS
Capitalization302M50.7M596%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.2413.390-155%
P/E Ratio7.43175.444%
Revenue135M4.95M2,726%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt252M32.8M768%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFQAX6.320.08
+1.28%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income A
DILCX11.680.12
+1.04%
Davis International C
RYAEX105.210.82
+0.79%
Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy A
GCVCX21.410.08
+0.38%
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts C
EILVX23.82-0.02
-0.08%
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value I

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with MOFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then MOFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
+1.00%
MOFG - HBCP
79%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
SMBC - HBCP
79%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
RBCAA - HBCP
79%
Closely correlated
+2.46%
EQBK - HBCP
78%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
THFF - HBCP
78%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with FULTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then FULTP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
N/A
FULTP - NSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
FGBIP - NSTS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
More