HBCP
Price
$71.34
Change
+$0.48 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
561.31M
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NSTS
Price
$13.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
66.65M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCP vs NSTS

HBCP vs NSTS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCP vs. NSTS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a StrongBuy and NSTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (HBCP: $71.34 vs. NSTS: $13.79)
Brand notoriety: HBCP and NSTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCP: 49% vs. NSTS: 36%
Market capitalization -- HBCP: $561.31M vs. NSTS: $66.65M
HBCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $561.31M. NSTS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $66.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNSTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NSTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HBCP and NSTS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while NSTS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($561M) has a higher market cap than NSTS($66.7M). HBCP YTD gains are higher at: 24.646 vs. NSTS (6.486). NSTS has less debt than HBCP: NSTS (28.4M) vs HBCP (54.7M). HBCP has higher revenues than NSTS: HBCP (151M) vs NSTS (9.81M).
HBCPNSTSHBCP / NSTS
Capitalization561M66.7M841%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.6466.486380%
P/E Ratio11.93N/A-
Revenue151M9.81M1,540%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt54.7M28.4M193%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCPNSTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NSTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWZLX18.290.33
+1.84%
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
HGOAX65.271.07
+1.67%
Hartford Growth Opportunities A
FOSBX34.660.24
+0.70%
Tributary Small Company Instl Plus
MSCQX12.84-0.02
-0.16%
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity I
MCSCX13.87-0.06
-0.43%
M3Sixty Small Cap Growth

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with UVSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then UVSP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
+0.68%
UVSP - HBCP
83%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
SRCE - HBCP
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
GSBC - HBCP
82%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
FBIZ - HBCP
82%
Closely correlated
+4.39%
TRMK - HBCP
81%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with FULTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then FULTP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
N/A
FULTP - NSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
FGBIP - NSTS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
More