HBCP
Price
$55.16
Change
+$0.66 (+1.21%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
422.93M
9 days until earnings call
SFBC
Price
$46.20
Change
-$0.23 (-0.50%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
109.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCP vs SFBC

Header iconHBCP vs SFBC Comparison
Open Charts HBCP vs SFBCBanner chart's image
Home Ban
Price$55.16
Change+$0.66 (+1.21%)
Volume$200
Capitalization422.93M
Sound Financial Ban
Price$46.20
Change-$0.23 (-0.50%)
Volume$138
Capitalization109.52M
HBCP vs SFBC Comparison Chart in %
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCP vs. SFBC commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a StrongBuy and SFBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCP: $54.50 vs. SFBC: $46.43)
Brand notoriety: HBCP and SFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCP: 48% vs. SFBC: 38%
Market capitalization -- HBCP: $422.93M vs. SFBC: $109.52M
HBCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $422.93M. SFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $109.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than SFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the short-term than SFBC.

Price Growth

HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.64% price change this week, while SFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($423M) has a higher market cap than SFBC($110M). SFBC has higher P/E ratio than HBCP: SFBC (18.87) vs HBCP (10.37). HBCP YTD gains are higher at: 19.855 vs. SFBC (-10.783). SFBC has less debt than HBCP: SFBC (41M) vs HBCP (148M). HBCP has higher revenues than SFBC: HBCP (142M) vs SFBC (38M).
HBCPSFBCHBCP / SFBC
Capitalization423M110M385%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.855-10.783-184%
P/E Ratio10.3718.8755%
Revenue142M38M374%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt148M41M361%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCP vs SFBC: Fundamental Ratings
HBCP
SFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1928
SMR RATING
1..100
3870
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5075
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4894
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBCP's Valuation (37) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBC (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (28) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's SMR Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBC (94) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCPSFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARAFF0.150.01
+8.46%
Arafura Resources NL
PGZFF0.12N/A
+0.75%
Pan Global Resource, Inc.
TTGXF0.03N/A
N/A
Trans Canada Gold Corp.
HNSDF131.65N/A
N/A
HENSOLDT AG
HPHTY5.81N/A
N/A
Hamamatsu Photonics

SFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFBC and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFBC and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBC
1D Price
Change %
SFBC100%
+1.24%
UBFO - SFBC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
FSUN - SFBC
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
WNEB - SFBC
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
BRBS - SFBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
HBCP - SFBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
More