HBCYF
Price
$14.35
Change
+$0.37 (+2.65%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
242.55B
SMFNF
Price
$27.10
Change
+$0.07 (+0.26%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
104.74B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCYF vs SMFNF

Header iconHBCYF vs SMFNF Comparison
Open Charts HBCYF vs SMFNFBanner chart's image
HSBC Holdings
Price$14.35
Change+$0.37 (+2.65%)
Volume$3.49K
Capitalization242.55B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$27.10
Change+$0.07 (+0.26%)
Volume$107
Capitalization104.74B
HBCYF vs SMFNF Comparison Chart in %
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCYF vs. SMFNF commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCYF is a StrongBuy and SMFNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCYF: $14.35 vs. SMFNF: $27.10)
Brand notoriety: HBCYF and SMFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCYF: 26% vs. SMFNF: 0%
Market capitalization -- HBCYF: $242.55B vs. SMFNF: $104.74B
HBCYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $242.55B. SMFNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $104.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $845.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $132.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMFNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HBCYF and SMFNF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMFNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the short-term than SMFNF.

Price Growth

HBCYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +4.64% price change this week, while SMFNF (@Major Banks) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.69% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($243B) has a higher market cap than SMFNF($105B). HBCYF has higher P/E ratio than SMFNF: HBCYF (13.84) vs SMFNF (13.14). HBCYF YTD gains are higher at: 58.844 vs. SMFNF (19.912). HBCYF has less debt than SMFNF: HBCYF (130B) vs SMFNF (31.54T). SMFNF has higher revenues than HBCYF: SMFNF (5.11T) vs HBCYF (69.1B).
HBCYFSMFNFHBCYF / SMFNF
Capitalization243B105B231%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD58.84419.912296%
P/E Ratio13.8413.14105%
Revenue69.1B5.11T1%
Total Cash246BN/A-
Total Debt130B31.54T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCYF vs SMFNF: Fundamental Ratings
HBCYF
SMFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6325
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
523
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2875

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFNF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (82). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (23). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (3). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (48). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (42). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCYFSMFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FA15.760.55
+3.62%
First Advantage Corp
TOUR0.96N/A
+0.22%
Tuniu Corp
MTZ215.810.41
+0.19%
MasTec
ABAT4.88-0.13
-2.59%
American Battery Technology Company
BIAF2.61-0.17
-6.12%
bioAffinity Technologies Inc

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
+2.65%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
BCS - HBCYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
BCLYF - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More

SMFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFNF has been loosely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMFNF jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFNF
1D Price
Change %
SMFNF100%
+0.26%
SMFG - SMFNF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
MUFG - SMFNF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
CMWAY - SMFNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
HBCYF - SMFNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
BACHF - SMFNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.13%
More