Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBGIX vs RWMFX
HBGIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HBGIX vs RWMFX
HBGIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBGIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBGIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. HBGIX (3.09B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HBGIX: RWMFX (1.40) vs HBGIX (0.14). HBGIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HBGIX (28 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HBGIX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HBGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). HBGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HBGIX (0) vs RWMFX (250). HBGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. RWMFX (7.92). HBGIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.91 vs. RWMFX (26.49).
| HBGIX | RWMFX | HBGIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.31 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.31 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.282 | 5.991 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.09B | 214B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.40 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | 7.92 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.74 | 33.64 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.91 | 26.49 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.23 | 86.15 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement