Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs IIFSX
HBLAX vs IIFSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs IIFSX
HBLAX vs IIFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. IIFSX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and IIFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. IIFSX (255M). HBLAX (3.15) and IIFSX (3.09) have matching dividends . HBLAX was incepted earlier than IIFSX: HBLAX (20 years) vs IIFSX (20 years). IIFSX (1.20) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). IIFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. HBLAX (90.00). IIFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: IIFSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.85 vs. IIFSX (1.77). IIFSX return over 5 years is better than : 10.64 vs. HBLAX (6.02).
| HBLAX | IIFSX | HBLAX / IIFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.83 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.20 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.034 | 4.397 | 137% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 255M | 4,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 3.09 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 1.77 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.30 | 30.83 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.02 | 10.64 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.50 | 38.48 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement