Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs IIFTX
HBLAX vs IIFTX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs IIFTX
HBLAX vs IIFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. IIFTX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and IIFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. IIFTX (250M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than IIFTX: HBLAX (3.13) vs IIFTX (2.74). HBLAX was incepted earlier than IIFTX: HBLAX (20 years) vs IIFTX (20 years). IIFTX (1.20) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). IIFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. HBLAX (90.00). IIFTX (6%) and HBLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. IIFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: IIFTX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.09 vs. IIFTX (1.04). IIFTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.89 vs. HBLAX (4.88).
| HBLAX | IIFTX | HBLAX / IIFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.83 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.20 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.335 | 3.268 | 163% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 250M | 4,400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 2.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 1.04 | 392% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.42 | 28.49 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.88 | 7.89 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.09 | 35.29 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers