Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MACVX
HBLAX vs MACVX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MACVX
HBLAX vs MACVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MACVX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and MACVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. MACVX (3.56B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MACVX: HBLAX (3.19) vs MACVX (2.41). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MACVX: HBLAX (20 years) vs MACVX (24 years). MACVX (1.58) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. MACVX (5.00). MACVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: MACVX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to MACVX: HBLAX (2000) vs MACVX (250). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. MACVX (3.61). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.15 vs. MACVX (3.57).
| HBLAX | MACVX | HBLAX / MACVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.58 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.58 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.670 | 2.503 | 147% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 3.56B | 312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 2.41 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.06 | 3.61 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.36 | 15.20 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.15 | 3.57 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.52 | 37.32 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement