Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MNMRX
HBLAX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.15
Change-$0.06 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.96B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$15.04
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.5M
HBLAX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMRX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and MNMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. MNMRX (304M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLAX (3.28) vs MNMRX (1.97). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLAX (19 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLAX (2000) and MNMRX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.75 vs. MNMRX (2.50). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.22 vs. MNMRX (2.46).
| HBLAX | MNMRX | HBLAX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.28 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.28 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.699 | 6.742 | 129% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 304M | 3,947% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.28 | 1.97 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.75 | 2.50 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.62 | 21.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.22 | 2.46 | 701% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.21 | 16.61 | 290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers