Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MNMRX
HBLAX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMRX
HBLAX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMRX commentary
Jul 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and MNMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. MNMRX (258M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLAX (3.18) vs MNMRX (2.60). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLAX (20 years) vs MNMRX (16 years). MNMRX (1.31) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. MNMRX (70.00). HBLAX (2000) and MNMRX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. MNMRX (3.11). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.16 vs. MNMRX (-1.50).
| HBLAX | MNMRX | HBLAX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.31 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.31 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.146 | 2.283 | 182% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 258M | 4,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.60 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 3.11 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.55 | 15.18 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.16 | -1.50 | -410% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.70 | 12.72 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement