Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs NAARX
HBLAX vs NAARX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs NAARX
HBLAX vs NAARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. NAARX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and NAARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NAARX (1.42B). NAARX (3.28) and HBLAX (3.15) have matching dividends . HBLAX was incepted earlier than NAARX: HBLAX (20 years) vs NAARX (11 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than NAARX (0.59). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. NAARX (6.00). NAARX (6%) and HBLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: NAARX (250) vs HBLAX (2000). NAARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. HBLAX (4.85). NAARX return over 5 years is better than : 22.23 vs. HBLAX (6.02).
| HBLAX | NAARX | HBLAX / NAARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.59 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.59 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.034 | 5.603 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.42B | 790% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 3.28 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 9.42 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.30 | 33.91 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.02 | 22.23 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.50 | 53.07 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement