Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs NAARX
HBLAX vs NAARX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs NAARX
HBLAX vs NAARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. NAARX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and NAARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NAARX (1.42B). NAARX (3.29) and HBLAX (3.18) have matching dividends . HBLAX was incepted earlier than NAARX: HBLAX (20 years) vs NAARX (11 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than NAARX (0.59). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. NAARX (6.00). NAARX (6%) and HBLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: NAARX (250) vs HBLAX (2000). NAARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. HBLAX (4.02). NAARX return over 5 years is better than : 21.08 vs. HBLAX (5.71).
| HBLAX | NAARX | HBLAX / NAARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.59 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.59 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.146 | 3.774 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 1.42B | 777% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 3.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | 8.39 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.12 | 29.47 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.71 | 21.08 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.90 | 51.13 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers