Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RLIAX
HBLAX vs RLIAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RLIAX
HBLAX vs RLIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RLIAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RLIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. RLIAX (313M). RLIAX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RLIAX (3.86) vs HBLAX (3.13). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RLIAX: HBLAX (20 years) vs RLIAX (21 years). RLIAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RLIAX (5.00). RLIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RLIAX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). RLIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. HBLAX (1.22). RLIAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.31 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| HBLAX | RLIAX | HBLAX / RLIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.076 | 4.446 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 313M | 3,482% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 3.86 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | 6.90 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.75 | 28.62 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.63 | 16.31 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.00 | 44.71 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement