Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMLCX
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMLCX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.96B
Russell Inv Lifepoints Moderate Strat C
Price$9.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.52M
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMLCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. RMLCX (127M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than RMLCX: HBLAX (3.28) vs RMLCX (2.82). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMLCX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMLCX (27 years). RMLCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMLCX (4.00). RMLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMLCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. HBLAX (2.66). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.68 vs. RMLCX (10.19).
| HBLAX | RMLCX | HBLAX / RMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.77 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.08 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.483 | 9.349 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 127M | 9,449% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.28 | 2.82 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | 7.17 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.89 | 24.64 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.68 | 10.19 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.03 | 1.31 | 3,661% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement