Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMLCX
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMLCX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.77B
Russell Inv Lifepoints Moderate Strat C
Price$9.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.08M
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMLCX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. RMLCX (123M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than RMLCX: HBLAX (3.35) vs RMLCX (2.87). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMLCX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMLCX (26 years). RMLCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMLCX (4.00). RMLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMLCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. HBLAX (2.98). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.97 vs. RMLCX (7.01).
| HBLAX | RMLCX | HBLAX / RMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.77 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.08 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.398 | 5.524 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 123M | 9,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 2.87 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.98 | 6.38 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.86 | 14.98 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.97 | 7.01 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.74 | -5.01 | -793% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement