Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMLCX
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMLCX
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMLCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. RMLCX (122M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than RMLCX: HBLAX (3.19) vs RMLCX (2.71). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMLCX: HBLAX (20 years) vs RMLCX (27 years). RMLCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RMLCX (21.00). RMLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMLCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.39 vs. HBLAX (6.52). RMLCX (5.37) and HBLAX (5.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HBLAX | RMLCX | HBLAX / RMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.79 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.11 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.532 | 4.721 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 122M | 9,180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 2.71 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | 13.39 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.64 | 30.59 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.30 | 5.37 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.39 | 17.36 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers