Ad is loading...
HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.29
Change-$0.22 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.99B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$9.42
Change-$0.08 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.72M
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMYSX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RMYSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. RMYSX (284M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RMYSX (5.24) vs HBLAX (3.37). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMYSX (10 years). RMYSX (0.92) and HBLAX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. HBLAX (4.60). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.45 vs. HBLAX (28.74).
| HBLAX | RMYSX | HBLAX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.75 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.92 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.230 | 2.966 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 284M | 4,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 5.24 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.60 | 6.93 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.33 | 5.54 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.74 | 33.45 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers