Ad is loading...
HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.26
Change-$0.21 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$9.28
Change-$0.52 (-5.31%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMYSX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RMYSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. RMYSX (302M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RMYSX (4.91) vs HBLAX (3.35). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLAX (18 years) vs RMYSX (10 years). RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. HBLAX (57.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX (8.79) and RMYSX (8.64) have marching annual gain over last year. HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.84 vs. RMYSX (10.03).
| HBLAX | RMYSX | HBLAX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.649 | 7.355 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 302M | 3,907% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 4.91 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.79 | 8.64 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.77 | 3.14 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.84 | 10.03 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers