Ad is loading...
HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.31
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.69B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$9.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.9M
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMYSX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and RMYSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. RMYSX (284M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RMYSX (5.58) vs HBLAX (3.41). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMYSX (10 years). RMYSX (0.92) and HBLAX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. HBLAX (4.32). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.79 vs. HBLAX (18.86).
| HBLAX | RMYSX | HBLAX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.75 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.92 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.807 | 3.508 | 52% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 284M | 4,120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 5.58 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 9.12 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.72 | 12.78 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.86 | 23.79 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.71 | 27.91 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers