Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.53
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$9.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.16M
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMYSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and RMYSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. RMYSX (286M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RMYSX (5.50) vs HBLAX (3.37). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMYSX (10 years). RMYSX (0.92) and HBLAX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. HBLAX (3.59). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.24 vs. HBLAX (12.06).
| HBLAX | RMYSX | HBLAX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.75 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.92 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.230 | 5.242 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 286M | 4,091% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 5.50 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.59 | 7.69 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.47 | 15.15 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.06 | 16.24 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.36 | 32.17 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement