Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMYSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RMYSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. RMYSX (296M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RMYSX (3.77) vs HBLAX (3.19). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLAX (20 years) vs RMYSX (11 years). RMYSX (0.95) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. HBLAX (90.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. HBLAX (6.67). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 13.68 vs. HBLAX (5.54).
| HBLAX | RMYSX | HBLAX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.78 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.324 | 4.392 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 296M | 3,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.77 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 13.49 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.39 | 33.21 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.54 | 13.68 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.10 | 49.29 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement