Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs UGTAX
HBLAX vs UGTAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs UGTAX
HBLAX vs UGTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. UGTAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and UGTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. UGTAX (914M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than UGTAX: HBLAX (3.13) vs UGTAX (1.96). HBLAX was incepted earlier than UGTAX: HBLAX (20 years) vs UGTAX (6 years). UGTAX (0.90) and HBLAX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. UGTAX (16.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than UGTAX (2%) vs UGTAX (2%). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGTAX: HBLAX (2000) vs UGTAX (2500). UGTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.19 vs. HBLAX (1.22). UGTAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.45 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| HBLAX | UGTAX | HBLAX / UGTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.83 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.90 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.076 | 4.505 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | 2% | 244% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 914M | 1,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 1.96 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | 7.19 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.75 | 38.18 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.63 | 30.45 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement