Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs WBAIX
HBLAX vs WBAIX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs WBAIX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.53
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Instl Cl
Price$17.06
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.91M
HBLAX vs WBAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. WBAIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and WBAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. WBAIX (234M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than WBAIX: HBLAX (3.37) vs WBAIX (2.09). HBLAX was incepted earlier than WBAIX: HBLAX (19 years) vs WBAIX (6 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than WBAIX (0.77). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WBAIX (27.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBAIX: HBLAX (2000) vs WBAIX (1000000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.59 vs. WBAIX (1.17). WBAIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.60 vs. HBLAX (12.06).
| HBLAX | WBAIX | HBLAX / WBAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.70 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.77 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.230 | 0.770 | 419% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 234M | 5,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 2.09 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.59 | 1.17 | 306% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.47 | 11.29 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.06 | 21.60 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement