Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs WBAIX
HBLAX vs WBAIX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs WBAIX
HBLAX vs WBAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. WBAIX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and WBAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WBAIX (165M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than WBAIX: HBLAX (3.15) vs WBAIX (2.14). HBLAX was incepted earlier than WBAIX: HBLAX (20 years) vs WBAIX (7 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than WBAIX (0.76). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WBAIX (18.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBAIX: HBLAX (2000) vs WBAIX (1000000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. WBAIX (0.48). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.51 vs. WBAIX (4.57).
| HBLAX | WBAIX | HBLAX / WBAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.70 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.76 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.523 | 1.653 | 395% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 165M | 6,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 2.14 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | 0.48 | 1,144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.84 | 9.93 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.51 | 4.57 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers