Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs WBALX
HBLAX vs WBALX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs WBALX
HBLAX vs WBALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. WBALX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and WBALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. WBALX (161M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than WBALX: HBLAX (3.13) vs WBALX (2.02). HBLAX was incepted earlier than WBALX: HBLAX (20 years) vs WBALX (23 years). WBALX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WBALX (18.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBALX: HBLAX (2000) vs WBALX (2500). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. WBALX (-1.22). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.79 vs. WBALX (2.98).
| HBLAX | WBALX | HBLAX / WBALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.85 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.03 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.614 | 0.666 | 843% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 161M | 6,832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 2.02 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | -1.22 | -296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.70 | 8.23 | 264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.79 | 2.98 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.35 | 39.09 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers