Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs WWIAX
HBLAX vs WWIAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs WWIAX
HBLAX vs WWIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. WWIAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and WWIAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWIAX (601M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than WWIAX: HBLAX (3.18) vs WWIAX (2.52). HBLAX was incepted earlier than WWIAX: HBLAX (20 years) vs WWIAX (19 years). WWIAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WWIAX (67.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than WWIAX (3%) vs WWIAX (3%). WWIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: WWIAX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). WWIAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to HBLAX: WWIAX (5000) vs HBLAX (2000). WWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.99 vs. HBLAX (4.94). WWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.94 vs. HBLAX (6.11).
| HBLAX | WWIAX | HBLAX / WWIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.02 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.02 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.286 | 5.155 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | 3% | 183% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | 5000 | 40% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 601M | 1,847% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.52 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | 12.99 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.62 | 33.56 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.11 | 12.94 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.99 | 16.47 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement