Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs WWICX
HBLAX vs WWICX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs WWICX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
Westwood Income Opportunity C
Price$12.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets546.71M
HBLAX vs WWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. WWICX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and WWICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. WWICX (547M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than WWICX: HBLAX (3.29) vs WWICX (2.78). HBLAX was incepted earlier than WWICX: HBLAX (19 years) vs WWICX (6 years). WWICX (1.76) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WWICX (57.00). WWICX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: WWICX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). WWICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. HBLAX (2.20). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. WWICX (9.66).
| HBLAX | WWICX | HBLAX / WWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.76 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.76 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.795 | 8.616 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 547M | 2,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.78 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 7.12 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 34.86 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.95 | 9.66 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers